A business does not stop after ten years, so the forecast ends with a lump sum for all later cash flows. That lump is usually 60% to 80% of the total value, which makes it the most important and most abused number in a DCF.
Perpetuity growth (default)
Assume the final-year cash flow grows at a constant rate forever. A growing perpetuity discounted at WACC has a closed form, the Gordon growth formula:
The subtle part is . Growth in perpetuity still requires reinvestment, and the amount depends on the return the company earns on new capital. If terminal return on invested capital is , the reinvestment rate needed to sustain is :
This is the growth-equals-reinvestment-times-return identity. Ignoring it lets a model assume free growth. When terminal ROIC is left blank the engine sets it equal to WACC, which means no excess returns in perpetuity: competition has eroded the moat, and growth adds no value. Setting ROIC above WACC asserts a permanent competitive advantage and is flagged.
Two constraints keep the formula honest. Terminal growth must not exceed the risk-free rate, because nothing outgrows the economy forever. And WACC minus is clamped to at least 0.5%, since the formula explodes as the two converge.
Exit multiple
Apply a market EV/EBITDA multiple to the final year. This borrows the market's pricing rather than reasoning from fundamentals, and quietly imports whatever the market believes today about growth and risk. Useful as a cross-check, weaker as a primary method.
Share of value in the terminal
The result reports the fraction of enterprise value that sits in the terminal. Above 90% with negative explicit cash flows means the valuation rests entirely on the far future.
Go deeper
- articleInvestopedia: Terminal value
- articleInvestopedia: Gordon growth model
- articleDamodaran: Closure in valuation, estimating terminal value (lecture notes, packet 2) · Covers the reinvestment × ROIC link and the growth cap.